Your mention of a "child porn room" escaped me, when you went on to describe reverse-child porn.
Even in that situation an op in #SexWithKids has done nothing illegal by allowing people to view his cam. It's the possession of elicit materials depicting children in sexual situations which is illegal. Being naked in front of a cam while re-enacting one's youth is not. </lawyer>
My arguement is that adults don't need webcams to be busted for posession of child porn. Owning a webcam doesn't make them any more suspect, nor does it help the FBI to clean up the internet. Perhaps if Video intergration allowed the FBI to set up #KidsWithWebcams channels to attract perverts, that's a different story.
- Raccoon
