And your code dont work...the actual replacement of the timestamp.
You mean YOU cant get it to work, not it doesnt work. Becuase im using exactly that code right now.
And no hundreds would take an extra mids to get the value, and it would only be cutting the last digit off.
Regardless, rather than say "it dont work" , what part of my code are you having trouble with?
Did you start it using /ms.timestampfmt
Did the timer start (check using /timer)
Is there a
s.000 in the timestamp format itself?
