Locutus needs to stop trying to undermine people's questions if he/she just can't provide an answer. I happen to know that in older versions there were not these identical restrictions, so if the poster was being restricted in the version he had at the time of the original post, then his assumptions were basically correct. I don't think his question should be so quickly invalidated just because he made one assumption based on his own recollection (which in this case was correct). Sometimes I feel the need to post after Locutus just so people still recognize the person's problem as legitimate, instead of a debunked screw-up on the part of the poster.
