Adding internal JPG support is one of those 'makes sense' functions considering BMP in raw format is just so huge. JPG is the absolute standard in image compression on the internet. This isn't an aesthetic appeal, this is just one of those "it makes sense to have it" ideas.
ok adding of jpg support was not added for asthetics?
please read the dictionary definition of asthetics and then find out exactly what a jpg is. actually nm ill simplify it all for u. asthetics is in a nutshell visually apealing to the eye, now a .jpg is an image file NOT A TEXT FILE. hence it was added for asthetics, and even beyond that, a bpm is also an IMAGE FILE. you actually should read your post and see how little sense u actually make? i dont care about your general concenses poll youve done, look at the slew of new irc clients that do support all this im suggesting?. and tell me that these other clients just added it just because. there is obviously a call or need or even demand for it, search the forums here and u can see how many times just the emoticons support has been asked for, there is a call for it and your simpley speaking out of your own opinion, which you are intitled to, but dont go tossing in saying youve researched it and there absolutly is not need for it and its useless, just because you and 5 of your buddies dont want it doesnt mean someone else doesnt. thats just plain being ignorant.infact im just done debating this with you. khaled can infact make his own judgement without the help or support of you and yur 5 buddies poll u done. ppl that stand in the way of progress usually get run over.
