mIRC Home    About    Download    Register    News    Help

Print Thread
#6664 15/01/03 12:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 154
B
BoredNL Offline OP
Vogon poet
OP Offline
Vogon poet
B
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 154
Improve /writeini so that it will write files that are over 64kb in size.. (the -n switch doesn't work for me)

I could create a custom alias to do this, but my God, why is it capped? I don't see why.


- Wherever you go there you are.[color:lightgreen]
#6665 15/01/03 12:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 395
M
Fjord artisan
Offline
Fjord artisan
M
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 395
If -n doesn't work for you, this post should go to Bug Reports :tongue:
Works for me - 6.03, XP sp1.

#6666 15/01/03 04:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 24
G
Ameglian cow
Offline
Ameglian cow
G
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 24
apparently, you don't know a whole lot about ini files in general =\

not saying that all ini files are like this anymore, but... the restriction isn't a "cap" -- it's a restriction in most all ini files, simply because the way they are read.

this is very similar to the "64k cap" you would run in to while coding a QBasic program. why it's at 64k, i have no clue.

if you can write something that would make it go over 64k, i think we would all benifit from it wink

#6667 15/01/03 07:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,321
H
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
H
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,321
If I recall correctly, 64K is one "page" of memory. In the olden-DOS days, conventional memory was the first 10 pages of memory, 0 through 9 and high memory started at the A page. This is most likely why ini files "used to be" limited to 64K, though I must admit, I can't imagine why that limitation would still exist.


DALnet: #HelpDesk and #m[color:#FF0000]IR[color:#EEEE00]C
#6668 15/01/03 08:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 24
G
Ameglian cow
Offline
Ameglian cow
G
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 24
that clears things up a bit for me, thanks hammer smile


Link Copied to Clipboard