|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,252
Hoopy frood
|
OP
Hoopy frood
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,252 |
dialog Observer {
title "Observer"
size -1 -1 670 230
option pixels
text "Account", 10, 5 5 120 16, center
combo 20, 5 21 120 100, edit drop
text "Route", 30, 125 5 60 16, center
combo 40, 125 21 60 100, edit drop
text "Name", 50, 190 5 30 16
edit "", 60, 240 4 280 18
text "Address", 70, 190 23 50 16
edit "", 80, 240 22 200 18
text "Apt", 90, 445 23 20 16
edit "", 100, 470 22 50 18
text "Phone", 110, 530 25 30 16
edit "", 120, 565 24 100 18
text "Special Directions", 130, 190 41 50 45, center
edit "", 140, 240 40 425 45
box "Deliveries", 150, 5 120 120 100
radio "Daily", 160, 7 134 50 18
radio "MP/LL", 170, 7 152 50 18
radio "Sat. Only", 180, 57 134 65 18
radio "Vacation", 190, 57 152 65 18
box "Billing", 200, 123 120 63 100
radio "PIO", 210, 125 134 40 18, group
radio "CMP", 220, 125 152 40 18
radio "Mthly", 230, 125 170 45 18
radio "Bi-Wkly", 240, 125 188 55 18
text "Start", 250, 190 85 100 15, center
edit "", 260, 190 100 100 18
list 270, 190 120 100 100, size
text "Stop", 280, 295 85 100 15, center
edit "", 290, 295 100 100 18
list 300, 296 120 100 100, size
text "Deliveries", 310, 400 85 50 16, center
list 320, 400 120 50 100, size
text "Billing", 330, 455 85 50 16, center
list 340, 455 120 50 100, size
text "Payment Amount && Date", 350, 510 85 155 16, center
edit "", 360, 510 100 50 18
edit "", 370, 565 100 100 18, disable
list 380, 510 120 50 100, size
list 390, 565 120 100 100, size
button "OK", 400, 530 6 40 18, ok
button "Cancel", 410, 575 5 40 18, cancel
button "Save", 420, 620 5 40 18
} I basically have two sets of radio buttons. The first set is a bit complicated as I need the ability to have more than one button marked (maybe checkboxes would be a better way of doing them). The second set of buttons are in a group so that I can only have one of them marked at a time. My problem lies in the fact that it doesn't matter which of the buttons I click, only the one I click is marked...including the buttons from the first set (which are not marked as a group). An explanation (if possible) would be great. For the first set of buttons (as I currently have them), what I'm needing is the ability to control them so that I can have the following combinations possible: 160 160 & 190 170 170 & 190 170 & 180 170, 180 & 190 180 180 & 190 As I said, I'm wondering if checkboxes might be a better way of handling those combinations, rather than radio buttons. Currently using mIRC 6.17
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,330
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,330 |
Hi RusselB. Yes, checkboxes would be your best option for what you're looking to do. And, if it's necessary to make one of the checkboxes not available when another is checked, that is easy to do as well with either an automatic uncheck/check command when you click the other one, or by enabling/disabling it when you click the other one.
As for the groups, I think that if you use groups, everything has to be grouped (so you'd need 2 groups).
Invision Support
#Invision on irc.irchighway.net
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Self-satisified door
|
|
Self-satisified door
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3 |
Check boxes would probably be ideal, but if you want to use radio buttons it can be done fairly easy as well. I posted this on another site where RusselB was looking for help so I'll copy it over to here as well.
radio "Daily", 160, 7 134 50 18, group
radio "MP/LL", 170, 7 152 50 18, group
radio "Sat. Only", 180, 57 134 65 18, group
radio "Vacation", 190, 57 152 65 18, group
box "Billing", 200, 123 120 63 100
radio "PIO", 210, 125 134 40 18, group
radio "CMP", 220, 125 152 40 18
radio "Mthly", 230, 125 170 45 18
radio "Bi-Wkly", 240, 125 188 55 18
and to uncheck the radio buttons I used this
on *:dialog:observer:sclick:*: {
if ($did == 160) {
if (%daily == 0 || %daily == $null) { set %daily 1 | did -c $dname 160 }
else { set %daily 0 | did -u $dname 160 }
}
if ($did == 170) {
if (%mp == 0 || %mp == $null) { set %mp 1 | did -c $dname 170 }
else { set %mp 0 | did -u $dname 170 }
}
if ($did == 180) {
if (%sat == 0 || %sat == $null) { set %sat 1 | did -c $dname 180 }
else { set %sat 0 | did -u $dname 180 }
}
if ($did == 190) {
if (%vaca == 0 || %vaca == $null) { set %vaca 1 | did -c $dname 190 }
else { set %vaca 0 | did -u $dname 190 }
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,741
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,741 |
Not that it makes a lot of difference, but you could have simply used !%var instead of (%var == 0) || (%var == $null)
-genius_at_work
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Self-satisified door
|
|
Self-satisified door
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3 |
I always seem to forget about !%var, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
