Interesting. An unfortunate inconsistency as /set -u0 works fine and is in heavy use. If a script wanted to convert to hashtables for speed, this inconsistancy wouldn't make it very easy.
Yes, I can see very valid uses of hadd -u0, especially with an existing hashtable filled with non-u0 items. hadd -u0 might be used as a method of erasing an item after the event ends since hadd overwrites by default, something you'd otherwise need a /timer to do.
- Raccoon
