|
|
Haze
|
Haze
|
when sum1 is kicked with the word "porn" in the reason i wanna, auto add the knick 2 pornlist how wud i do this? wot wud the identifiers be? thx
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973 |
on 1:KICK:#: { if ($knick != $me) && ($istok($1-, porn, 32)) /write pornlist.txt $knick }
|
|
|
|
Haze
|
Haze
|
Nah Nah i mean i want the person who was kicked (pornbot) to automatically be added 2 my userlist u kno wot i mean?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973 |
on 1:KICK:#: { if ($knick != $me) && ($istok($1-, porn, 32)) /auser level $address($knick, 11) }
|
|
|
|
pheonix
|
pheonix
|
or u cud use on ^*:KICK:#:{ if ($knick != $me) && (*porn* iswm $2-) { auser porn $address($knick,1) access # add deny $address($knick,1) } else { HALT } }
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973 |
just stop talking plz...
First off the ^ prefix is not needed. Secondly, he was looking for adding it to a user level, not channel access list. Thirdly, is it so pointless to add else { halt }
|
|
|
|
pheonix
|
pheonix
|
i know but the ban makes it better, using the ^ is the way ive been taught and else { makes it quicker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973 |
Quicker? no..It takes more time for mirc to evaluate a halt, then to just visibly see that the end of the statement is right there.
|
|
|
|
pheonix
|
pheonix
|
no because if the else { isnt there mirc has to decide what to do if it isnt = to if (w.e
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973 |
Whatever-- Even if *if* you were right, is a few hundreths, if not thousandths) of a second going to matter?
|
|
|
|
codemastr
|
codemastr
|
Assuming mIRC does anything like most scripted languages for an unconditional branch (else statement), it is SLOWER to include an else statement. I have no idea why you would think it would be faster. The reasoning you gave made no sense at all.
|
|
|
|
pheonix
|
pheonix
|
1. who cares 2. it wud also be very quick to evaluate an else statement
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,973 |
okay, go ahead and be 13 keys closer to arthritis per statement >:D
|
|
|
|
|
|