|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Ameglian cow
|
OP
Ameglian cow
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23 |
when sum1 is kicked with the word "porn" in the reason i wanna, auto add the knick 2 pornlist how wud i do this? wot wud the identifiers be? thx 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012 |
on 1:KICK:#: {
if ($knick != $me) && ($istok($1-, porn, 32)) /write pornlist.txt $knick
}
-KingTomato
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Ameglian cow
|
|
OP
Ameglian cow
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23 |
Nah Nah i mean i want the person who was kicked (pornbot) to automatically be added 2 my userlist u kno wot i mean?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012 |
on 1:KICK:#: {
if ($knick != $me) && ($istok($1-, porn, 32)) /auser level $address($knick, 11)
}
-KingTomato
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
or u cud use
on ^*:KICK:#:{
if ($knick != $me) && (*porn* iswm $2-) {
auser porn $address($knick,1)
access # add deny $address($knick,1)
}
else {
HALT
}
}
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012 |
just stop talking plz...
First off the ^ prefix is not needed. Secondly, he was looking for adding it to a user level, not channel access list. Thirdly, is it so pointless to add else { halt }
-KingTomato
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
i know but the ban makes it better, using the ^ is the way ive been taught and else { makes it quicker 
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012 |
Quicker? no..It takes more time for mirc to evaluate a halt, then to just visibly see that the end of the statement is right there.
-KingTomato
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
no because if the else { isnt there mirc has to decide what to do if it isnt = to if (w.e
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012 |
Whatever-- Even if *if* you were right, is a few hundreths, if not thousandths) of a second going to matter?
-KingTomato
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,809
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,809 |
Assuming mIRC does anything like most scripted languages for an unconditional branch (else statement), it is SLOWER to include an else statement. I have no idea why you would think it would be faster. The reasoning you gave made no sense at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
1. who cares
2. it wud also be very quick to evaluate an else statement
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
Hoopy frood
|
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012 |
okay, go ahead and be 13 keys closer to arthritis per statement >:D
-KingTomato
|
|
|
|
|
