Register Log In

Forums Scripts & Popups badnick ban on nick change

Print Thread

badnick ban on nick change #213467 28/06/09 06:08 PM
B Babystone
Babystone B	can anyone help on this badnick ban on nick change ?? * hot_man_848 is now known as awake-dick * lalala sets mode: +b dick!@ what is the correct code for this?

Re: badnick ban on nick change #213468 28/06/09 06:16 PM
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 3,641 Montreal, QC, Canada A argv0 Hoopy frood
argv0 Hoopy frood A Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 3,641 Montreal, QC, Canada	Code: on :NICK: { if ($me isop #mychannel && $nick ison #mychannel && dick* iswm $newnick) { mode #mychannel +b dick!@ } }

Re: badnick ban on nick change argv0 #213512 29/06/09 09:28 PM
B Babystone
Babystone B	hmmm i put this but it dun seem to work Originally Posted By: argv0 Code: on :NICK: { if ($me isop #myroom && $nick ison #myroom && dick* iswm $newnick) { mode #myroom +b dick!@ } }

Re: badnick ban on nick change #213513 29/06/09 09:31 PM
Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 4,035 France W Wims Hoopy frood
Wims Hoopy frood W Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 4,035 France	Code: on :NICK: { if ($newnick isop #myroom && $newnick ison #myroom && dick* iswm $newnick) { mode #myroom +b dick!@ } } Little mistake, he was checking $nick ison #chan instead of $newnick Edit : was another mistake, $me is only updated at the end of processing all on nick event so here, the value is the same as $nick, and of course the old nick isn't op in the channel, I've updated the code. Last edited by Wims; 29/06/09 09:55 PM. #mircscripting @ irc.swiftirc.net == the best mIRC help channel

Re: badnick ban on nick change Wims #213514 29/06/09 11:30 PM
Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,124 United States T Tomao Hoopy frood
Tomao Hoopy frood T Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,124 United States	Wims, it's Quote: if ($me isop #myroom) not $newnick

Re: badnick ban on nick change Tomao #213515 29/06/09 11:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 4,035 France W Wims Hoopy frood
Wims Hoopy frood W Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 4,035 France	He He true I made some test related to this and simply considered my test as the answer #mircscripting @ irc.swiftirc.net == the best mIRC help channel

Re: badnick ban on nick change Tomao #213516 29/06/09 11:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,483 Greece westor Hoopy frood
westor Hoopy frood Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,483 Greece	Correct with this : Code: on :NICK: { if (($me isop #myroom) && ($newnick ison #myroom) && (dick* iswm $newnick)) { if ($newnick isop #myroom) { mode #myroom -o $newnick } mode #myroom +b dick!@ } } NOTE: It checks if the newnick is operator if it is deop him first and then ban him

Re: badnick ban on nick change westor #213517 30/06/09 12:02 AM
Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,124 United States T Tomao Hoopy frood
Tomao Hoopy frood T Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,124 United States	Yes, but that extra if statement is needlessly useful because I haven't seen an operator who likes to act like a "dick" yet...if you know what I mean.

Re: badnick ban on nick change Tomao #213518 30/06/09 12:21 AM
Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 7,168 Ontario, Canada R RusselB Hoopy frood
RusselB Hoopy frood R Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 7,168 Ontario, Canada	The only ops that I've seen act that way didn't remain ops for long, once the owner/founder was notified.

Re: badnick ban on nick change Tomao #213519 30/06/09 12:21 AM
Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,483 Greece westor Hoopy frood
westor Hoopy frood Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,483 Greece	Yes, the dick is the manual example and i use it for example.

Re: badnick ban on nick change westor #213614 02/07/09 01:31 PM
S s00p
s00p S	Code: on :NICK: { if (($me isop #myroom) && ($newnick ison #myroom) && (dick* iswm $newnick)) { mode #myroom -o+b $newnick dick!@ } } My question is, if course, why not just ban dick!@ permenantly?

Re: badnick ban on nick change #213633 04/07/09 11:21 AM
Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,483 Greece westor Hoopy frood
westor Hoopy frood Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 1,483 Greece	Originally Posted By: s00p Code: on :NICK: { if (($me isop #myroom) && ($newnick ison #myroom) && (dick* iswm $newnick)) { mode #myroom -o+b $newnick dick!@ } } My question is, if course, why not just ban dick!@ permenantly? This code will deop the dick and make a ban at dick , but if the dick is not oper why you must deop him/her ? , thats the way that i added the if ($newnick isop $chan) { mode $chan -o $newnick } , it check's first for if the user is an operator and if is deop him if not did not then just make the ban only.

Link Copied to Clipboard