mIRC Home    About    Download    Register    News    Help

Print Thread
#108088 16/01/05 04:56 PM
M
Mc_Fly
Mc_Fly
M
/hdel -sw <item1> [item2,...]

like /unset <%var1> [%var2...]

what do you think ?

Last edited by Mc_Fly; 16/01/05 05:03 PM.
#108089 16/01/05 05:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,013
F
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
F
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,013
Don't you mean /hdel instead of /hdec

/hdel would make more sense due to your /unset reference.

#108090 16/01/05 05:03 PM
M
Mc_Fly
Mc_Fly
M
yes, sorry, i'm tired...

#168936 17/01/07 12:18 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 822
J
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
J
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 822
If you mean /hdel -sw <name> <item1,[item2,item3,...]> then I'm for this.

Also /hfree -sw <name1,[name2,name3,...]> would be nice. smile

Jigsy #168949 17/01/07 04:49 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,168
R
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
R
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,168
I agree this would be nice, although I think the w switch should only be required if one or more of the items has a wildcard in it, and that the w switch only applies to the item(s) that have the wildcard.

Eg: /hdel -sw table1 item1 item2* item3 item4*

The wildcard switch would only apply to items that started with item2 or item4, so item20 would be deleted, but item12 wouldn't.

RusselB #170321 07/02/07 02:29 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 201
J
Jae Offline
Fjord artisan
Offline
Fjord artisan
J
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 201
Originally Posted By: RusselB
Eg: /hdel -sw table1 item1 item2* item3 item4*

The wildcard switch would only apply to items that started with item2 or item4, so item20 would be deleted, but item12 wouldn't.


I'm guessing using regex to match items to close would be asking too much..


Link Copied to Clipboard