menu nicklist {
» Add to Hostlist:.auser hostlisted $1
» Remove From Hostlist:.ruser hostlisted $1
}
On @*:join:#: { if (hostlisted isin $level($nick)) { mode # +o $nick }
}
oh you posted you want it done manualy while i was typing thiis thing
menu nicklist {
$iif($me isop $chan,» Controle $$1 )
.$iif($me isop $chan,» Host $$1 ):/mode $chan +o $$1
.-
.$iif($me isop $chan,» DeHost $$1 ):/mode $chan -o $$1
-
}
From my first Post.
I want to be able to give op to someone in all the channels I am in, having op.. Like IF i am in 30 channels,
and then a freaind joins, 23 of them, and I want to op him, in all channels, then I fo not have to ho in the 23 channels to op hip manualy.. but just use a /command or a rightclik menu, to give a op commando that gives him op in all 23, ar once. Like: /mode $chan +o Gomp..
Only, that that only op in the channel I am typing it in..
$active <-- I even tested with that, and actives, and chans, etcetera..
It there not a option for this?
and are there anywhere youcan see all the $something commands?
(sorry the spelling, I cannot see this little text, and I just make more mess by trying to correct it.)
No hard feelings or anything..
Juts to prove I did infact point that out in the first point.
I see how spelling it wrong may have been a factor though.
I tested that code, and all it did was to op the person in the chaneel where I right clicked, like doing the same and oping him would do..
I want to have it op in all channels I am in, and that the other person I want to op, is in, only by one command..
THank you for giving it a go though.
I'll just do it manually like this..
/opbot /op gomp #channel | op gomp ... .... . .. on and on and on..
I was just looking for a easy way, and again it is nothing but overvomplications. (Really no oofecne or anything, this just has happende every time I post here,.. I used more time to get back to the actuall issue in the first post than I do .. ther eI do it again.)
I wish there was a command like /op gomp $chans
That would just seek out every place I could uop him.
but, 'll do it manually now..
SO I bet my bets, on that nect time I open here, there is a easy way I could have used...
Gah.. So frustrating to not be able to make onself understood.
And I do not want to look like I am blaming you, but did you read all words as in the entire post, or just a few lines, and jumped at it?
Just curious, maybe I should write in block next time.
