|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 426
Fjord artisan
|
OP
Fjord artisan
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 426 |
Yes, I'm aware that there have been many posts on dialog docking before, however, I have come up with another way to do it, and figured I may as well suggest it in a new thread.
We currently have options for dialogs (such as dbu, notheme, etc), so I figured why not have an option for the dialog to become dockable.
ie:
option dbu dock
Then, when running the dialog, a switch could be set to specify where the dialog would dock to.
eg:
/dialog -mp <position> <name> <table> <text>
In this instance, the [x y w h] paramters are not needed (as it is specified in a position)
These are the following positions:
top bottom right left nicklist
The docked dialog would then be draggable to any other part of the mIRC window.
-------- mIRC - fun for all the family (except grandma and grandpa)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
quote: The docked dialog would then be draggable to any other part of the mIRC window.
i think that misses the point of a docked dialog
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
yer, docked dialogs are supposed to stay where theyre docked :tongue:
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 242
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 242 |
Actually, being able to drag and dock it where you want would be nice. A lot of software has this ability.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
actually i dont thing that a docked dialog opened to stay a certain place should be moved. thats just my opinion. if i wanted to move it then i wouldnt have docked it, now would i?
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
exactly, a movable docked dialog wouldnt be a docked dialog, it would just be the same as it was before docking it .
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 242
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 242 |
lol .. I think you guys need to look up the word dock.
Here is one definition: To maneuver (a vessel or vehicle) into or next to a dock.
Here is another: To move or come into a dock.
Nowhere in any definition for dock does it say it can't be moved to another dock.
And then there is stationary: a. Not moving. b. Not capable of being moved; fixed.
so dockable dialog and stationary dialog would be two different things no?
Reply to _D3m0n_ So currently, all that is available is floating dialog. All three options would be nice with floating being the default option IMO. So if you do not wish to use this option, you're not required to.
Option: 1: The act of choosing; choice. 2: The power or freedom to choose.. End reply to _D3m0n_
Last edited by r0ck0; 22/09/03 03:24 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
i think you knew what we meant :tongue:.
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
really? so u think that docked means movable? or not fixed position? well if you dont dock a dialog using a dll in mirc currently your able to move it anywhere...... u can remove the titlebar and have it appear without them just as if it was docked..... now that being said ..... there is NO need to EVER add anything else to mirc using your way of thinking..... because mirc already has movable dialogs.
i think u need to really rethink your statements before u post them, instead of jumpin my statements. im pretty damn sure currently the way mirc is there is no need to add anything like a docked dialog thats movable. now please tell me your not completely ignorant and are gonna argue that?
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
hes being ignorant because you proved his idea has no uses.
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
actually its not his idea its neophytes idea .. which really is a good idea, it just needs to be thought out differently. maybe saying all dialogs should have the drag and drop grips to them to look more like the other dialogs in mirc would be the best way to support this idea..... not even docking them at all... just by adding that to it it would then function like the other programs mentioned above. i am not saying the idea is wrong, only the method of accomplishing it.
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
see the above post, im not saying i dont have use for it. only that the method of accomplishing it should be different. actually it is a very nice idea. altho i do not support the idea of docking it and then being able to move it after? that has absolutly no use to me once its docked it should stay there and not be able to be moved at all. i like the way ktools docks things and makes them stay there. thats how i would want this dock function to work as well.
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,138
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,138 |
No it doesn't. Are you saying that the makers of Winamp, Windows, Trillian, AIM and countless other programs are all "missing the point" of dockable windows/toolbars because they allow you to undock them?
Simple solution: add a second switch, or a parameter of the current switch to chose whether ot not the dialog would be undockable.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
collective the current nicklist in mirc is docked..... it doesnt move unless u do it thru the options... now the current dialog scheme in mirc all dialogs are moveable.. just by grabbing a corner and moving it. now suggesting a dock function be added that doesnt truly change anything in mirc dialogs is a useless idea. for a couple of reasons.
what would this feature add that cannot already be done? answer nothing. since u can already move any dialog in mirc already anywhere u want it. dockin should be added yes. but in a different method than suggested
as for the other programs u listed. thos dialogs are not stationary either. they operate just as any dialog in mirc already does currently. u grab the side and drag it where u want it. let go and it stay there. thats not a FIXED position dialog. now i dont know what u consider docked, and i cannot argue what docked is in your mind.But to me what was suggested above is useless because its already accomplishable without even adding one dll.nor does it need to be scripted. i do however support a docked feature similar to how ktools docks dialogs. and actually id like to have a docking feature which had all dialogs have the grips as in the 6.1. having each section of it able to move. That would be the best way in my opinion to change how all the dialogs work. i would love to take the nicklist and move it where i want it. the toolbar and put it where i want it.and things like that. if this is the way mirc is heading im all for those additions. i was glad to see the grips on the switchbar and the toolbar, but disapointed the toolbar one didnt even work.
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,138
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,138 |
what would this feature add that cannot already be done? answer nothing. since u can already move any dialog in mirc already anywhere u want it. Of course you can already move dialogs in mIRC whatever you want them, but since when could you drag them to the side of the window and have them stick there, as a docked dialog works with ktools.dll, and as windows docked to eachother do in winamp? You can't, atleast not without the use of DLLs. As r0ck0 said, a better way to put it would be "being able to snap it to a docked position". Personally I thought it was obvious that that was what the orignal poster meant, or atleast that he meant they would be undockable. I think a dialog that is "docked" to something else means that when that something else is moved, the docked dialog moves with it. That is exactly what ktools.dll does, as does winamp. When the desktop is resized docked AIM windows, trillian windows and Windows toolbars move to the side of the desktop they were docked to, undocked ones stay where they were.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,809
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,809 |
I believe what he means is something like the switchbar. Where you can move it to dock it to a different side of the screen.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 242
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 242 |
yes .. perfect example .. wish I would've thought of that before. So good examples would be:
menubar & toolbar = stationary options dialog = floating switchbar = docked
Last edited by r0ck0; 22/09/03 04:38 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
and i also said that would be the way id like to see it as well ... using them grips, actually id prefer every window to be some type of that method. As really that would be the way to do every dialog not just a select few.
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012 |
Another example is like the C# compiler, VC++6, even word... You can "drag" the icon-toolbar dialogs to the position you wish to have it. A docket dialog, as was already said, does not mean to attack it to a fixed position. it simply means position it in a certain area.. By this, we mean general area, not exact x,y location.
-KingTomato
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,962
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,962 |
Why have it for every dialog? Docking doesn't make sense for most dialogs.
Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
|
|
|
|
|