Forums Bug Reports CMODE +y bug

Don't even remember what you said? "Because it doesn't only happen with CR." My point is, yes, it is only CR, because as far as I know, no "Global" IRCd exists, that means it is only CR.

Where does it say the name of any other IRCd in that sentence?

The name of the other IRCd that was mentioned in this thread WAS MENTIONED BY SOMEONE ELSE. It just happens that I believe what they are saying. If you don't then it's a matter for you, I couldn't care less.

Global does exist... It is an IRCd made in perl and it is called globalstage... This IRCd can be found at irc.scifi.com 6666, 6667, and 6668.



globalstage in my opinion is a very crapy IRCd...

You and codemastr need to get acquainted.

ok maybe im mistaken but +y isnt even in the chanmodes= in CR so if its not there tellin mirc it is ...... then how can u say this ismircs fualt? i mean thats like me asking u to make me a sandwich and when u bring me tunafish sandwich im upset cause u didnt bring me bologna

expecting something to operate properly when u dont tell it how to or with what info is impossible to expect ..... in my opinion CR is at fualt .... and since CR costs an ungodly amount of money id say they should start making [censored] that works correctly with mirc ... as it is by far the most popular irc client made. why doesnt hybrid or unreal ircds have this problem like cr is? probably because even tho they are free ware ... they actually work properly with mirc ... ironic isnt it? u never wanna shed bad light to the sacred CR but in this case your wrong .. admit and be a man about a mistake of cr .. it is not like u wrong the mistake. why take it so damn personal

You haven't read the whole thread either. If you did you'd see that there is more than one IRCd involved, more than one mode type involved and more than one user reporting issues where only ONE SINGLE chat programme (mIRC) is affected. I hardly think CR costs much anyway, I helped build two rack servers about 6 weeks ago and each one has about $50,000 worth of software on board with on-going licence fees approaching the million mark over the life of the software (including upgrades).

At anyrate this discussion isn't freeware v's commercial software. Both CR and mIRC have to be paid for as far as I remember. I don't know about Global IRCd though.

yes i did read the entire thread of this OTHER ircd affected ....... but CR was the source of the main complaint in this thread ..... not this OTHER ircd your trying to bring into the discussion. remeber a wise man once said 2 wrongs dont make a right. having 2 ircds that are afected doesnt make it a bug when in all reality there are probably 20 who arent. Mirc is not the cause of this bug ... its piss poor coding on the part of CR and the other mentioned ircd. And im not turing it into a freeware vs commercial software debate. Im pointing out CR costs an ungodly amount of money and yet all these other freeware ircds work and dont have this issue. Defend CR all u want but this whole thread doesnt convince me of any great feature in it. certainly not a bug worth paying for

From Webmaster support:

Without extensive testing I couldn't really tell you. However, that seems
like a mIRC issue and not a server one.

Now... Lets get one thing straight, I did not bring up the issue regarding the Global IRCd, someone else did, if you did read the thread correctly then you'd know this. Other thing is that Khaled was here yesterday and may have read this thread and I am yet to see him comment on it. Blaming servers for something that only hapens to mIRC just doesn't wash, and I don't care who the maker of the server is.

sure believe someone who hasnt even looked into it enough ..... hold on im gonna report my bug in windows to microsoft and im possitive they are gonna tell me at first its not thier error its mine ...... then later they will release a fix on it. believe what u want its obvious no one can convince u of anything u dont wanna see plain as day. the bug is infact in CR for having an undocumented mode yet not bothering to publish it in chanmodes= thats the whole bottom line end of story. mirc doesnt know what to do with the mode when its not in that list of supported modes. ive pasted u your own text which proves thats not even there. you cant see all im doing is showing u exactly why its not mircs fualt because uve got this sacred hardon for CR. again im sorry i even bothered to try to show u the error isnt infact mircs its CR.

So you are saying that if you created something which some other person believed there was a bug with, they shouldn't believe your "story" in relation to what was at fault? Well, in the absence of any more qualified information, I am taking their advice. Your belief that software can make people sexually aroused just shows your immaturity and shows that you have only posted to stir. This will never sink into your head but the mode is undocumented because chat programmes are not meant to be affected by its existence. You'll never be able to get away from the fact that only mIRC is affected. And it is affected by more that one IRCd.

sexually aroused??? wtf are u talking about? give me some of them drugs uve been takin. seriously tho your not even seeing what im saying at all. If I made a program and without testing it thouroughly someone told me they found a bug and i told that person i didnt think it was my programs fualt ur gonna take my word for it? if your going to then your a fool

you cant see all im doing is showing u exactly why its not mircs fualt because uve got this sacred hardon for CR

I believe you said that. Apart from that there is nothing in your posts not already mentioned by codemastr, so your posts were worthless and contribute nothing. At least, in my case, I consulted the maker of one of the IRCd's that cause this glitch in mIRC instead of just hurling insults. Don't get me wrong, I'm not offended by your silly remark, it would be nice to have a discussion on something without those who can't be bothered resorting to these childish and un-necessary (and stereotypically teenaged) insults.

I'll add to this. My first experience on IRC was EFnet, when the Australian node got hacked/smurfed, basically destroyed, I changed to another network, which was owned by the same company that owned the Efnet node I used. I am an oper on that network and it is perfectly reasonable, in my view, for opers to have a personal favourite IRCd. If it happens that someone doesn't agree with me though, I respect that. The world would be boring if we all liked the same things.