mIRC Home    About    Download    Register    News    Help

Print Thread
#37099 19/07/03 03:55 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
W
woozey Offline OP
Self-satisified door
OP Offline
Self-satisified door
W
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
Spam on most networks through the abuse of private message is a problem. I can script a msg block, d/l one or even dissable pm. But for a new user its perplexing. So i suggest just as the /remote (on/off) displays red dots on the tool bar icon, a pm block icon that displays red when on. Additionally it could reply a simple reply to the person sending the msg eg. woozey's prvt msg off.

#37100 19/07/03 05:04 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 155
S
Vogon poet
Offline
Vogon poet
S
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 155
Well, you can type "/ignore -p *" or click on the Address Book icon and then go to control to add an ignore entry; but perhaps you're right, and that option should be a little more user-friendly.

#37101 19/07/03 02:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,809
C
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
C
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,809
IMHO thats a horrible idea. If you respond each time you receive a PM, I can flood you off the server. I connect with 15 different bots each of which messages you every 5 seconds. My bots don't get disconnected because it is once every 5 seconds, however you will get disconnected since you'll be sending a message once every .3 seconds. So you'll be first "lagged" by the server to try and stop your flooding, then eventually you'll be killed. I really don't think thats a good idea at all.

#37102 19/07/03 03:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,985
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,985
The networks that don't provide server-side advertising protection need to start thinking about it. Bahamuck and CR (at least, possibly others) have had it for a while now. Since it is a rule that there is no advertising it stands to reason that the networks should be the ones that provide at least some defence against it.

#37103 19/07/03 03:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,809
C
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
C
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,809
I'm assuming you're referring to +R on DALnet? Well there is a reason that not all networks provide that... not all networks have services. +R prevents non-registered nicks from messaging you. So if all nicks are not registered, such as on EFnet, well then such a mode would be useless.

#37104 19/07/03 03:22 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
P
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
P
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
menu channel {
Queries
.On: .disable #noquery
.Off: .enable #noquery
}
on *:TEXT:*:?:{
if ($group(#noquery).status == on) {
window -c $nick
haltdef
}
}

#noquery off
no query
#noquery end


new username: tidy_trax
#37105 19/07/03 03:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,985
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,985
I was but CR's doesn't rely on your name being registered. You get the protection anyway.

At anyrate, it's not intended to be a "my network is better because it has the protection" merely a message that some have it so all should.

#37106 19/07/03 08:48 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
W
woozey Offline OP
Self-satisified door
OP Offline
Self-satisified door
W
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
I can code it, in fact mine is quite elaborate using userlevels. But my point is I sit day after day in help chans helping countless "newbies" with "how can i block spam" and i paste line after line then explain where they have to type it, then how to remove it. So i think it would be very easy for Khaled to include a icon that simply does /ignore -p * . then if replying maybe once per 5 secs. in case of flood. If your worried about flood protection on your bot code something sure. im talking ppl who are new to mirc and what i consider a most overlooked feature.

#37107 19/07/03 09:46 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 155
S
Vogon poet
Offline
Vogon poet
S
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 155
I get where you're going, but the reply message sounds like a bad idea to me also.

Maybe just the option to block private messages from everyone should be a little more accessible; but I don't think that's going to happen. If the users took the time to read the help file they would find out about /ignore eventually, but some people are just lazy.

#37108 19/07/03 10:48 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,809
C
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
C
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,809
I think having such an icon is a horrible idea. We'll get swamped with tons of "I can't receive messages!!!!" posts with the reason of "I was playing around with toolbar buttons to see what they do" If you really want it as a toolbar button, use a dll.

#37109 20/07/03 12:12 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
W
woozey Offline OP
Self-satisified door
OP Offline
Self-satisified door
W
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
/ignore -p * is a bad idea ?
"I can't receive messages!!!!" is never muttered in a help channel by someone who's last help was told to type /ignore -p * ?
A newbie knows he is on dalnet and can type //mode $me +R ?
There are tons of ppl who get themselves into a pm convo that is looking ugly. Are they going to chose then to read the help file ?
Do these ppl want. Are you feeling lonely http://.. popping up every 5 mins when all they want to do is chat in channel ?
I'm suggesting tie /ignore -p * in with an icon that turns red. then if a good idea reply once every 5secs and or echo msg's received exceed 5. You can script whatever you like and ignore the feature.

#37110 20/07/03 05:35 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 143
N
Vogon poet
Offline
Vogon poet
N
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 143
I just made this for spammers that zoom/msg users in PM

Code:
on 1:join:#:{
  set -u5 %joinnick $nick 
}

on ^1:open:?:*: { 
  if (($nick == %joinnick) && ($comchan($nick,0) == 0)) { 
    halt
  }
}


We don't just write the scripts, we put them to the test! (ScriptBusters)
#37111 20/07/03 06:33 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 155
S
Vogon poet
Offline
Vogon poet
S
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 155
Did you and pheonix even read his post completely?! He already said that he can script a message block.

Really, learn how to read the threads and replies completely before posting...

#37112 20/07/03 08:15 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
P
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
P
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
yes i know, but why add it when a script as simple as mine can be added, as codemastr said adding it into mirc will get you killed off the server.


new username: tidy_trax
#37113 20/07/03 08:15 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
Pardon? Pheonix? Thats naki, with only 69 posts, not 1000+ Do you ever read the name completly? >:P

EDIT: sry, my turn to rip for an improper name reply >:F


-KingTomato
#37114 20/07/03 08:16 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
P
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
P
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Quote:
Did you and pheonix

read^


new username: tidy_trax
#37115 20/07/03 08:18 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
* KingTomato kins in the corner in shame, in fetal position

Just as I suspected, time for bed >:D Eyes are the first to go grin


-KingTomato

Link Copied to Clipboard