|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9
Nutrimatic drinks dispenser
|
Nutrimatic drinks dispenser
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9 |
If you doubt me, just try scripting on MSN and try using /ctcpreply or .ctcpreply
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 395
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 395 |
But command prefixes are mIRC things. They're not sent to the server!
No matter if you type /ctcpreply or /.ctcpreply, server gets only CTCPREPLY.
Unless, of course, you have your own /ctcpreply alias, or you're using sockets to send it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
yes but what your describing there isnt mirc commands ...... your describing server commands ......... a ctcpreply is a mirc command which sends a signal from ur machine to the others with whatever information ur providing along with it ........ this accesscrap your talking about is just ircx commands to ban someone ........ its like internally built services into the ircd....... with that said u need to read my above post to him about my child and the help file .......
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9
Nutrimatic drinks dispenser
|
Nutrimatic drinks dispenser
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9 |
You are very sure /ctcpreply $chan TIME works, you should try doing that command connected to MSN - so that you wouldn't doubt anymore - because MSN isn't just your normal IRC Server
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
ok lets go slowly for u then .... if u type ctcpreply $chan TIME mirc is going to send a ctcpt reply from your machine out to the channel ...... regardless of whether the server recognizes that command or not its a mirc command putting these prefixes on it wont change the fact it is still sent ........ read the help file on prefixes
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9
Nutrimatic drinks dispenser
|
Nutrimatic drinks dispenser
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9 |
Ok, the problem is that the server will not respond if you perform the command /ctcpreply $chan TIME but will respond to the command /.ctcpreply
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
lol i doubt highly u really realize what your saying the server has nothing to do with a ctcp unless its ignoreing it thru modes of some kind ...... if the one works the other would have to work ...... mirc sends commands thru ctcpreply whether u prefix it with any of the default mirc prefixes or not ....... when u send that ctcp your sending your time to the entire channel ..... try doing it with a specific user and see what happens maybe they have modified it so u cant send a ctcp to everyone in a channel as it will flood a room
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,012 |
Lets try to clear this up once and for all...
Command Line Command Sent:
/ctcp ChanSys TIME -> <network> PRIVMSG ChanSys :TIME .ctcp ChanSys TIME -> <network> PRIVMSG ChanSys :TIME /.ctcp ChanSys TIME -> <network> PRIVMSG ChanSys :TIME
Enough said. Now, no matter what is typed in mirc the same command line is sent to the server
-KingTomato
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
ty im glad to see im not the only one trying to explain this to them till im blew in the face ...... maybe i just need to get me a better sig and ill be ok haha
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
thankyou i told them
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
no it is much different, to connect to msn you need to use a series of dll's and everything and the maker of the connection has obviously made his own mirc commands simply because msn attempted to ban mirc
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
as he said at least twice, msn isnt a normal server as mirc is 'banned' there, so therefore msn isnt going to recognise standard mirc commands is it, no, so therefore maybe that is just a mirc command created by the maker of the connection inside a dll or ocx etc, all were saying is the / prefix and the . prefix do not work in msn! it has to be /.
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
oheonix listen to me really slowly i will say this yet again for u .......
1: typing ./ctcp PING #CHAN isnt a server command ...... its not really anything to do with the server ....... but it may have been blocked ........ now with that said if u type the command your mirc will still send it ..... u just wont get a reply no matter what u do .....
ok so lets recap this ppl are complaining they cant use thier mirc on a server that they arnt supposed to be anyhow ..... and come here to get an answer because they cant figure it out ...... then whine about the answers given to them
well for all of those ppl i will only say this one simple thing /debug @Debug and type the command in msn servers ..... u will see it sends it its just ignored by server
its a shame u Cant Understand Normal Thinking, but im seriously tired of saying the same exact things over and over to ppl who just dont get it. do not bother posting back to me as whatever your going to say is probably the same thing uve said last month before crying and apologizing or its the same thing all the msn ppl have said either i care not to hear it
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
i never said it didnt send but i meant it didnt work meaning: there is no point in sending a ctcp if youre not going to get a response.........
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
ok so your honestly telling me that mirc sends the ctcp out from it using any method but it only returns it if u use both prefixes? well then how in the hell would anyone here in this forum be able to answer a question that changed the mirc standard protocals of how it delivered commands when this dll or ocx (lmfao) or whatever the hell u wanna call it, is written by someone else?
final answer on this topic: GO ASK YOUR FRIENDLY MSN HACKER
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
im not saying you should know but why would you argue when i know what im talking about and you dont
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,527 |
ok just so u know i surely do know what im saying its quite plain and simple read this post un the connection uissues forum sticky thread even MSN NOT WANTING MIRC THERE Parabrat a moderator here had emailed MSN chat directly and asked exactly what your telling me im wrong about ...... so if your wondering where im getting this info from there ya go ..... straight from MSN ...... THEY DO NOT WANT ANYTHING OTHER THAN THIER SOFTWARE BEING USED ON THIER SERVERS ok now how does that translate to me being wrong and u being right? because last i know ive said MSN doesnt want MIRC on thier servers ..... plainly that falls under the catagory u have no f$*king clue what your saying ....... now dont post the im wrong comment again to this thread ... it should be closed because u Cant Understand Normal Thinking ...... and not read things and find out fact before you look ignorant
D3m0nnet.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
i really dont care what u say
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,265 |
also i dont even go on msn any more i was just stating he is right.And your rong
new username: tidy_trax
|
|
|
|
|