on *:text:*:*:if (test isin $1-) && (tester isin $1-) { /window -g2 $iif($chan,$chan,$nick) }
thers nothing wrong with that, you might wanna do this tho
on *:text:*:*:if (test isin $strip($1-)) && (tester isin $strip($1-)) { /window -g2 $iif($chan,$chan,$nick) }
I sure these are not the words but just in case TEST and TESTER dont need
(test isin $strip($1-)) as test is in tester so well be found in the tester isin.
Actually i would use this
on *:text:*:*:if (*test*tester* iswm $strip($1-)) || (*tester*test* iswm $strip($1-)) { /window -g2 $iif($chan,$chan,$nick) }
Use just one of the iswm if the words should only appear in one order
but none of them are able to detect the words if there are [ | ] around them, ex bot says [test|tester] then nothing happends
Dont know why that would be.
dunno if this is a bit too much to ask for, so far iv'e been told that it's nearly impossible to get something like that working. something about not being native supported and other stuff i didn't understand.
Sounds like the person who told you that didnt have native support themselfs. Unless there refering dierectly to nnscript which i have never seen.