Great idea! But there's one nuance. What if the user wants some other ghost text to be displayed as an input example?
I propose extending the syntax by adding an additional colon-separated parameter (highlighted in red) to fill with ghost text to be displayed when the dialog edit field is empty. Besides, it would be more correct to call the style "ghost" or in this case it is possible to do without it altogether:
edit "text":"(ghost text)", 3, 8 92 290 22, autohs ghost
Also, it would be possible to add a new switch for the command "did":
/did -x <name> <id> [ghost text]
