The situation isn't about being a bad suggestion, it's about the principal of the problem you presented in the original post. You claim the timer mechanism is unreliable, however your solution is to use the same unreliable function of the program, but which accepts an additional date input. You're contradicting yourself in this suggestion, which has nothing to do about being flexible or not. My suggestion of the addition of accepting CTIME values is about flexibility, however like others have pointed out it's pointless because you're not solving the problem itself -- which is easily avoided by currently provided scriptable solutions.
Last edited by _Memo; 21/11/08 01:12 AM.