ANOTHER FOLLOWUPThis is a really interesting result ..look at /fopen
Test results for hadd,setv,file tests:
size: 10000
-----------------------------------------------------
hadd: 1.062
setv: 26.484
file: 4.937
fopen: 0.469
as array sizes get bigger hadd barely even competes with fopen. and /set is over 4 times slower than /write.
Maybe /fopen should be under more consideration when dealing with large chunks of data?
Keep in mind this test stresses on multiple /fwrite or /hadd commands, and does not look at retrieving data from a list. Hash / file speed depends on how they are used.