There is a simple point in all this: things that are reported to be true are not accepted until the same results can be reproduced by others. So until someone other than you can produce output which produces the results you give (heck, until YOU can give such code to begin with), your claim has no value whatsoever. This has nothing to do with opinion, it's the way the scientific world works. Remember a while back some guys discovered nuclear fusion (or fission) at room temperatures? No one belueves they did, cause no one could reproduce it. the same principle applies here.
Second - others have reported the same results as me, backup up my claim.
Thirdly, (again) - until you can back your claim with data, it has no meaning. You still have not made a singler attempt to back up your statement.
PS: CODEMASTER: I did check that the amt of iterations in my code is the same, in both loops it is exactly 50,000.
