ANOTHER FOLLOWUP

This is a really interesting result ..look at /fopen

Code:
Test results for hadd,setv,file tests:
 
size:  10000	
-----------------------------------------------------
hadd:  1.062	
setv:  26.484	
file:  4.937	
fopen:  0.469


as array sizes get bigger hadd barely even competes with fopen. and /set is over 4 times slower than /write.

Maybe /fopen should be under more consideration when dealing with large chunks of data?

Keep in mind this test stresses on multiple /fwrite or /hadd commands, and does not look at retrieving data from a list. Hash / file speed depends on how they are used.

- argv[0] on EFnet #mIRC
- "Life is a pointer to an integer without a cast"