Using /color doesn't update the Treebar - 22/10/06 04:13 AM
Using /color doesn't update the text or background colors in the Treebar
Re: Using /color doesn't update the Treebar - 22/10/06 06:16 PM
I can't seem to reproduce the problem here, if I use /color treebar N where N is a number from 0 to 15 the treebar background is updated immediately with the selected color. The same happens when modifying the treebar text color. Are you sure you are using the correct parameters, /color treebar N and /color "treebar text" N.
Re: Using /color doesn't update the Treebar - 22/10/06 07:03 PM
I'm talking about it's usage in this way...
I change the RGB value and the Treebar still uses the delfault RGB value for the index.
Quote:
To change the color of the Nth color in the 16 color palette to a new value, you can use /color <index> <rgb>
I change the RGB value and the Treebar still uses the delfault RGB value for the index.
Re: Using /color doesn't update the Treebar - 23/10/06 06:24 PM
This also works fine for me here, using //color 0 $rgb(255,255,255) and then //color 0 $rgb(255,255,0), back and forth. Are you sure you're changing the correct color index?
Re: Using /color doesn't update the Treebar - 23/10/06 06:52 PM
Sorry... it appears that I was using the wrong index number. 
Any chance we might get to edit the RGB values in the colors dialog in the future?
Any chance we might get to edit the RGB values in the colors dialog in the future?
Re: Using /color doesn't update the Treebar - 23/10/06 08:16 PM
Already possible, just rightclick on any of those little coloured squares.
Re: Using /color doesn't update the Treebar - 23/10/06 09:20 PM
why isnt it possible to use more than 16 colors? i mean like prefixing them with $chr(3) like it is already and use rbg codes? like []FFFFFF ? because of the messagelength limit of 510?
Re: Using /color doesn't update the Treebar - 24/10/06 07:46 AM
Other IRC clients don't support it, and messages would look awful to those.
Yeah it's a bit of a pain that other things hold mIRC back (and vice versa if other client authors have considered extending them) but IRC is about communication, so it wouldn't be a wise idea to start adding unsupported jargon to messages :tongue:
Yeah it's a bit of a pain that other things hold mIRC back (and vice versa if other client authors have considered extending them) but IRC is about communication, so it wouldn't be a wise idea to start adding unsupported jargon to messages :tongue: