nick color by user level - 03/03/05 07:01 AM
Not sure if this is a bug, or just a lack of feature, but when I have two userlevels specified for a single user, only the first one in the user list seems to matter as far as nick coloration. The order in which the colors appear in the address book (colors tab) is pretty much ignored. For example, say I have these entries in users:
allowmsgs:*!ident@host
clone:*!ident@host
Now, clones are set up in the address book to appear in, say, magenta. Allowmsgs are set to appear as blue, or no entry at all -- doesn't matter. Also doesn't matter which entry appears first in the colors list. Mirc will ignore the clone entry as far as nick colors go.
Basically, what I'm saying is that mIRC should not stop at the first matching userlevel for a nick. Coloring should be determined by the order in which they appear in the colors list, not the users list.
Edit: Oh, yes, of course.. 6.16/XP+SP2
allowmsgs:*!ident@host
clone:*!ident@host
Now, clones are set up in the address book to appear in, say, magenta. Allowmsgs are set to appear as blue, or no entry at all -- doesn't matter. Also doesn't matter which entry appears first in the colors list. Mirc will ignore the clone entry as far as nick colors go.
Basically, what I'm saying is that mIRC should not stop at the first matching userlevel for a nick. Coloring should be determined by the order in which they appear in the colors list, not the users list.
Edit: Oh, yes, of course.. 6.16/XP+SP2