Better nick completion

Print Thread

Better nick completion #70323 04/02/04 09:34 PM
S sunken
sunken S	When I type nick + [tab] it complete the nick, i want it to add a : + [space] afterwards like this: sunken + [tab] = sunken: in Script editor, Tab called "Remote" type the following and restart irc on *:INPUT:#:if $$1 ison $chan && ($$2) { msg # $1 $+ : $2- \| haltdef }

Re: Better nick completion #70324 05/02/04 06:36 AM
Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,256 Sunnydale, CA L LocutusofBorg Hoopy frood
LocutusofBorg Hoopy frood L Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,256 Sunnydale, CA	Actually, all you have to do is close the remotes. This code does not in any warrant the restarting of the program. I can't test it here, so this could be wrong, but the on INPUT event usually requires you to use halt, and not haltdef. On a side note - thise code also doesn't do what TAB does. TAB actually completes the nick, this code requires you to type out the complete nick. Code: on :INPUT:#: { [color:green]; if you typed out a complete nick[/color] if ($1 ison $chan) && ($2) msg $chan $+ : $2- [color:green]; if only one nick matches the letters you typed[/color] elseif ($ialchan($+($1,!@),$chan,0) == 1) msg $chan $ialchan($+($1,!@),$chan,1) $+ : $2- [color:green]; if no nicks match the letters you typed[/color] elseif ($ialchan($+($1,!@),$chan,0) == 0) echo -a ERROR: no matches found [color:green]; if more than 1 nicks match the letters you typed[/color] else echo -a ERROR: more than one match found halt } This code actually completes the nick. Not to be a meany, but I do wonder about your use of () in the if statement. Why do you not use them on the first condition, but you do use them on the second?

Re: Better nick completion #70325 05/02/04 10:28 AM
Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,256 Sunnydale, CA L LocutusofBorg Hoopy frood
LocutusofBorg Hoopy frood L Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,256 Sunnydale, CA	edit: scratch the sidenote - using tab + code will work.

Re: Better nick completion

#70326 11/02/04 09:11 PM

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 806

cold

Hoopy frood

cold

Hoopy frood

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 806

Pay more attention at your codes, please test them before posting:

Code:

on *:INPUT:#: {
  if ($1 ison $chan) &amp;&amp; [color:red]($2)[/color] msg [color:red]$chan $+ :[/color] $2-
  elseif ($ialchan($+($1,*!*@*),$chan,0) == 1) msg $chan [color:red]$ialchan($+($1,*!*@*),$chan,1)[/color] $+ : $2-
  elseif ($ialchan($+($1,*!*@*),$chan,0) == 0) echo -a ERROR: no matches found
  else echo -a ERROR: more than one match found
  halt
}

The correct version is:

Code:

on *:INPUT:#: {
  if ($1 ison $chan) &amp;&amp; [color:green]($2 != $null)[/color] msg [color:green]$chan $1:[/color] $2-
  elseif ($ialchan($+($1,*!*@*),$chan,0) == 1) msg $chan [color:green]$ialchan($+($1,*!*@*),$chan,1).nick[/color] $+ : $2-
  elseif ($ialchan($+($1,*!*@*),$chan,0) == 0) echo -a ERROR: no matches found
  else echo -a ERROR: more than one match found
  halt
}

Edit - Below is a better version, since the previous ones still halt the process even when you don't want to complete anything:

Code:

on *:INPUT:#: {
  if ($2 == $null) { return }
  if ($1 ison #) { msg # $1: $2- | halt }
  elseif ($ialchan($1*!*@*,#,0)) {
    if ($ifmatch &gt; 1) { echo -ag ERROR: more than one match found }
    else { msg # $ialchan($1*!*@*,#,1).nick $+ : $2- | halt }
  }
}

Nonetheless, I think all these methods are poor as nick completion features.

Last edited by cold; 11/02/04 09:21 PM.

Link Copied to Clipboard

Forums Scripts & Popups Better nick completion