|
|
ScatMan
|
ScatMan
|
if (nick isowner #chan), what it does? i did that on someone that has a "!" mode and it didn't work
|
|
|
|
pheonix
|
pheonix
|
i only know that as an msn user with a . prefix :tongue:
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,256
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,256 |
Far as I know, iswoner is not supported by mIRC (at least it's not defined in the if-then-else section of the helpfile). And if it is a MSN thing then you won't find help on it here seeing how MSN doesn't allow mIRC users to connect to their network.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,884
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,884 |
isowner checks if someone has the owner userlevel on the channel. I only know it to work with mode q and prefix '.'.
|
|
|
|
ScatMan
|
ScatMan
|
hmm, it must be prefix . ? i dunno where i can find a server with such modes. will this work just with mode +q ?
|
|
|
|
pheonix
|
pheonix
|
+a on some servers "apparently"
|
|
|
|
ScatMan
|
ScatMan
|
but what it checks exactly ? if there is a "." in front of the nickname or what ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 153
Vogon poet
|
Vogon poet
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 153 |
isowner works for IRCX servers. It is an undocumented feature that is used to check if a user is an owner (mode +q with the "." prefix). The owner status gives you higher privileges than the operator status.
This is not an MSN-only thing, obviously. There's a very limited number of IRCX networks out there, and that is why you've probably never come across one.
|
|
|
|
pheonix
|
pheonix
|
ircX has everything msn has as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 153
Vogon poet
|
Vogon poet
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 153 |
I said that this is not an "MSN-only" thing!
OMG, you should REALLY REALLY learn how to comprehend what you freaking read!
Wait, I'll explain it to you in words that you can understand: MSN is IRCX, but MSN is not the only IRCX network out there, that is why I said that it is not an "MSN-only" thing.
Do you understand now?
|
|
|
|
pheonix
|
pheonix
|
you should understand as well that i was pointing it out so that no1 asks what access and props are.......
|
|
|
|
Om3n
|
Om3n
|
isowner does not work with +a (!)... as that mode is not an owner mode it is the equivelent of a SOP. As far as i have been able to tell that identifier only works on networks that apply a different mode / prefix to the channel owner/founder.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,958
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,958 |
No-one would have asked - the thread was about the mode prefix of a channel founder and the ISOWNER identifier.
|
|
|
|
pheonix
|
pheonix
|
well not many people who use normal irc would care/ask what isowner is for, when it is not a normal irc mode.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,958
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,958 |
And that has something to do with PROP and ACCESS?
|
|
|
|
pheonix
|
pheonix
|
if he started asking what isowner is because he heard someone speaking about it, why not ask about prop and access when he hears that
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,958
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,958 |
Because ISOWNER is to do with mIRC's recognition (or lack thereof) of channel ownership and PROP\ACCESS are server-side channel management functions. In other words two entirely different subjects.
|
|
|
|
codemastr
|
codemastr
|
Except the "!" is for UltimateIRCd (and a couple of other IRCds) and none of them have PROP/ACCESS, so your argument is irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
Om3n
|
Om3n
|
If ACCESS is to do with the customised access levels of users in channels, then yes Ultimate IRCd does have that. Though im not positive thats what ACCESS is for.
|
|
|
|
|
|