Forums Scripts & Popups Auto replies?

Hi I was wondering if it is possible to have the mirc chat bot programed to respond to certain words typed in the chat room and how I do that. For example I have an onjoin welcome that the bot gives which is :

Welcome ¤Talathia¤. Nice to see you again I hope you are well this fine night. The Inn is open and the streets are quiet & safe, enjoy your evening.

usually the people say thankyou or ty, I would like the bot to say "your welcome" or something like that and have no idea how to do it.

Example:

This code will respond to thankyou, thank you, ty and thanks:Note this will only react to the words themselves, NOT in a sentence anywhere.

Hm, both scripts will thank for some message containing "typewriter" or "panty" . My two cents:Without $me-check you'll inevitably have "false positives"; but with a $me-check you'll likely miss many occasions to respond

--double post-- :X

I've addressed that matter just now, Horstl. I made it to match exactly the words themselves. And you noticed you double-posted your reply.

thanks so much guys, much appreciated.. but I must be doing something wrong, I tried all three and none of them worked.. I copied and pasted into the remote section on a new line under the welcome onjoin command, saved it and then tried it and nothing happened.

I also had a question regarding adding the bots name, do I just add the name like this:

on *:text:*:#:{
if ((*thank*you*guard* iswm $strip($1-)) || (*ty*guard* iswm $v2)) && ($me isin $v2) {
.msg $chan Your welcome, $nick $+ .
}
}
OR this one:

on $*:TEXT:/^(thank? ?you guard|ty guard|thanks guard)$/iS:#:.msg # your welcome, $nick $+ .

OR this one:

on *:text:*:#yourchan: {
if ($1-2 == thank you guard) || ($1 == ty guard) { msg $chan You're welcome, $nick $+ . }
}

However, if i cant get these to work as is i guess that should be my first problem to solve ..

Don't put three of these scripts in the same remote, because they'll likely cause conflict and render neither of them workable. You only choose one to use. I recommend these two:If you pick Horstl's, you should construct it this way:

No no, I didnt put all three in, I put them in one at a time and tried each one individually, i only used all three in the example above because they were different and I wanted to make sure that which ever one i went with eventually when i could make it work, i would be able to add the name the right way.