mIRC Home    About    Download    Register    News    Help

Print Thread
#211653 27/04/09 01:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
T
telia Offline OP
Self-satisified door
OP Offline
Self-satisified door
T
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
what community thinks about service that provides IRC offline messages? e.g. you connect to the channel and receives all messages you missed because of being offline

telia #211654 27/04/09 01:59 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,559
H
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
H
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,559
How could mIRC (or any other IRC client) do this? To get "offline messages", someone has to log them while you're offline.

The logging has to be done either by another "client connection" to the IRC network, e.g. listening for messages containing your nickname (for example a bot you set up and host remotely), or by a bouncer (a remotely hosted relay connection that keeps "your" connection alive) with a "log feature".

Or the network itself stores messages for you - some network feature a "MemoServ", which other chatters may use to leave a limited number of notes for "you" (your registered nickname). That's a network feature, of some networks, and in no way related to mIRC.

Anything beyond that would make up a (theroretical) feature request for the developers of the different IRCDs, which are developed 100% independent of the client software you use to connect/chat on an IRC network (like mIRC). And it's very unlikely to happen ever, for the way the IRC protocol is designed. Many networks / IRCDs don't even support nick registrations - and to identify to "your messages", you'd need a standardized account system etc pp. Keep in mind that IRC is more than mIRC - it's a protocol, used by dozens of different chat clients on dozens of different IRCDs, and designed for online chat. smile

On a general scale, the constrainment of developement of any features like your request is not caused on the client side. It is caused by the heterogeneous IRC "networkscape" which had evolved over the time - by the fact that there's not "the one" IRCD. Have for example a look at the IRC+ project ...

Last edited by Horstl; 27/04/09 02:31 PM.
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
T
telia Offline OP
Self-satisified door
OP Offline
Self-satisified door
T
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
on this stage I'm more interested whether this feature would be helpful. why to think about implementation if it can be useless

telia #211657 27/04/09 02:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,523
Q
Hoopy frood
Offline
Hoopy frood
Q
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,523
Conversely, why discuss the usefulness of the feature if the implementation can be shown to be infeasible? Splitting this conversation in stages and discussing certain aspects in isolation is somewhat unrealistic.

Note that implementation details also determine the appropriate place for this thread. If the implementation has nothing to do with mIRC itself (which Horstl showed), this thread is more suited to General Discussion.

Last edited by qwerty; 27/04/09 03:16 PM.

/.timerQ 1 0 echo /.timerQ 1 0 $timer(Q).com

Link Copied to Clipboard