|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Self-satisified door
|
OP
Self-satisified door
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4 |
$pid() and $process() identifiers to check whether a program is running or not, mostly to be used by bots, saying a service is up or down.
example: $pid(400) returns $true or $false wether a process with id 400 exists $process(notepad.exe) returns $true or $false wether a process with name notepad.exe exists.
Last edited by Horstefan; 26/10/08 05:24 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 468
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 468 |
How is this related to *Services* being up or down? PS: It can be scripted in $COM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,432
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,432 |
PS: It can be scripted in $COM Yes it can be scripted, but that goes for the most of the features requested in here.
if ($me != tired) { return } | else { echo -a Get a pot of coffee now $+($me,.) }
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,741
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,741 |
This sounds like a potentially useful feature. Although, I would have it work more like this:
$pid(<number>) $pid(400) - Returns $null if PID 400 does not exist - Returns the name of PID 400 if it exists, ie notepad.exe
$pid(<program>,n) $pid(notepad.exe,1) - Returns $null if a program called notepad.exe isn't running - Returns the PID of the nth program called notepad.exe, or if n=0 returns total number of programs called notepad.exe
$pid(<number/name>[,n]).<param> $pid(400).handles - Returns $null if the PID/program doesn't exist - Returns the specified param data * <param> could potentially be any column that is displayed in the windows task manager (view > select columns). ie handles, threads, username, memory, description, etc.
-genius_at_work
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,918
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,918 |
I guarantee that right after an mIRC release with $pid in it, someone will suggest to manipulate those process ids; the ability to kill a process, change its priority, etc.
- argv[0] on EFnet #mIRC - "Life is a pointer to an integer without a cast"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,741
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,741 |
So you are suggesting a /pid command then?
-genius_at_work
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,063
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,063 |
with such a command it would become even easier to trojans to do their work abusing mIRC for it's own good. giving them the ability to kill virusscanner processes etc for instance.
I would highly suggest against such a feature ( the /pid one ).
I'm also not really sure what the $pid identifier would add personally but maybe someone can explain some usecases which show more then one person actually having use for it.
If it ain't broken, don't fix it!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 842
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 842 |
Agreed. As for the $pid identifier, myggan wrote one on mircscripts.org.
What do you do at the end of the world? Are you busy? Will you save us?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 218
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 218 |
No more dangerous than the $encode/$decode identifiers. You could just put a lock on them the same as Run/dll/decode/com
Last edited by vexed2; 27/10/08 04:49 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,138
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,138 |
I'm not sure why you think it would be a security risk, the capability to end processes via script already exists via /run, /dll and $com.
Also, if your virus scanner is letting anyone kill it then your virus scanner sucks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Self-satisified door
|
OP
Self-satisified door
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4 |
with such a command it would become even easier to trojans to do their work abusing mIRC for it's own good. giving them the ability to kill virusscanner processes etc for instance.
I would highly suggest against such a feature ( the /pid one ).
I'm also not really sure what the $pid identifier would add personally but maybe someone can explain some usecases which show more then one person actually having use for it. I would not like to see a /pid command for above reasons, if the $pid() feature could be realised it would be awesome!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,918
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,918 |
The question is, how many people actually need process control when scripting? It doesn't seem to me like a common scripting task. Common tasks make sense to add to mIRC.. less common ones are perfectly okay when left as one-line snippets people can import when needed.
I'm not a big fan of clogging up the global space. Adding an extra identifier would break any script already using some custom $pid identifier since identifiers can't be overloaded like /commands can. I don't get what the advantage of putting this in mIRC is? Unlike the poster above, I disagree that all (most) feature suggestions here can be scripted.. Most of the valid feature suggestions I see are ones that extend the language to allow scripters to do things they could not; I'd rather see more of those.
- argv[0] on EFnet #mIRC - "Life is a pointer to an integer without a cast"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,193
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,193 |
I agree. Snippet that allow you to get info on process (or even kill them) already exists.
#mircscripting @ irc.swiftirc.net == the best mIRC help channel
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Self-satisified door
|
OP
Self-satisified door
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4 |
There shouldnt be any question about "needing" a function. It would be nice if this function is available though. edit: [read: available --> more simple to access] Scripting is usefull, but not neccesary.
Last edited by Horstefan; 15/12/08 05:15 PM.
|
|
|
|
|