|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Mostly harmless
|
OP
Mostly harmless
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1 |
I know mIRC can run off usb as it is now with out a problem but what is the likelyhood of a u3 port of mIRC. I think it would be killer.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 65
Babel fish
|
Babel fish
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 65 |
 Huh? What does mIRC have to do with the Universol Serial Buss? Its a port..on your computer...that mirc dosnt interact with (unless you use usb ethernet adaptors...and even then it just binds to the ip stack, windows works out all hardware issues) What is this U3 you speak of?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 655
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 655 |
They mean that mIRC can currently be run off a usb device, such as a flashdrive and so on.
As for U3, a quick search came up with "New technology from a company called U3 allows a drive to store and, when plugged into any PC, securely run applications--without leaving a trace of data on the host computer. The applications (which must be U3-compliant), data, and personal settings all reside on the portable drive, permitting you to temporarily turn any Windows 2000 or XP system into a personal workstation without threat to your privacy."
I believe the suggestion is a U3 compliant version of mirc, or for mirc to be made u3 compliant.
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his attitude" - Flutterby
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,330
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,330 |
I'm curious as to the need. mIRC can already be run without putting any information on a computer it is connected to.
Invision Support #Invision on irc.irchighway.net
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,063
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,063 |
I'm curious as to the need. mIRC can already be run without putting any information on a computer it is connected to. it will write it's last close time to the registry... which would be an interaction with the host machine
If it ain't broken, don't fix it!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 372
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 372 |
Would that be a great problem though?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,230
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,230 |
He did say "mIRC can already be run..." Its not hard to deny a program access to a spot in the registry.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 655
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 655 |
Indeed, but the attempt could be noticed or logged. Besides, doing such a thing would prove very hard on a machine that is not your own. From my understanding a U3 compliant program should leaves no traces on any system, it should run entirely contained on the portable drive without any system requirements other than the os being 2k/xp
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his attitude" - Flutterby
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,330
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,330 |
Personally, I can't see many legitimate reasons to need this. Let's see what I can think of for reasons to use such a thing...
1) Use mIRC at work without leaving records other than internet traffic... (not illegal, but immoral)
2) Run mIRC on someone else's computer without their knowledge (again, not necessarily illegal, but still immoral)
3) Parents/Spouse/etc. told you that you couldn't use mIRC and chat on IRC and you want to do so without being caught (again, not illegal, but immoral)
4) Run mIRC on someone else's computer with their knowledge, where you're just trying to prevent your login information information from being seen by the other computer (legitimate reason, but this is possible running it off a USB device... it won't matter if the "last run" time is in the registry as it doesn't have "secret" information)
Yes, I know "immoral" is a "fluid" word in that the meaning changes per person, but I think that most will agree that doing any of those things I marked as being immoral really are wrong to be doing.
Any others? I admit I may be missing something, but I just really don't see a legitimate need to hide that you were using mIRC.
And, in any case, internet traffic would still be logged if any logging method were used. You can't hide that just by running it with this U3 thing.
Invision Support #Invision on irc.irchighway.net
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,230
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,230 |
Damn but its hard to run anything that doesnt leave a trace somewhere, just the act of selecting the program to run leaves traces. The program would have to go in and actually remove the fact it was run.
Also i doubt if a system was monitoring activity at any levvel you could ever hide , simple monitors like antivirus sometime record some levels of activity, and then advanced monitoring like api watchs, you would never get away from. Still i guess U3 likely means the application by its own hand leaves no trace. I have never heard of the thing before.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 580
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 580 |
It would be better if Microsoft made a Compact XP version that could be installed on 256KB or larger USB drives and booted from a PC that supports booting of USB drives...
Although Microsoft should limit access to the host computer's drives unless the administrator's password is known for the drive.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,330
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,330 |
256kb? That really IS compact! 
Invision Support #Invision on irc.irchighway.net
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 580
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 580 |
LOL, that would be! Sorry, change that to MB... 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,230
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,230 |
I have a bootable floopy disk with less than 256k on it, and that gives me full access to all the drives, so its possable to do.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,330
Hoopy frood
|
Hoopy frood
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,330 |
Yes, but he specifically said Comapct XP. 
Invision Support #Invision on irc.irchighway.net
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 655
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 655 |
I dont see much pratical use for altering mirc in any way to be a 'u3' compliant program either, and i hadn't heard of it prior to this thread either.
Wouldn't booting an os off a flashdrive be very slow?, the os has to configure itself for the hardware in the system, everytime you change the system it would have to redo it?
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his attitude" - Flutterby
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 580
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 580 |
Wouldn't booting an os off a flashdrive be very slow?, the os has to configure itself for the hardware in the system, everytime you change the system it would have to redo it?
Such XP systems already exist and are also on CD's (Read-Only!).... Ever hear of ERD commander? It's a CD-Based version of XP that is used in emergencies (ERD=Emergency Recovery Desktop).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 655
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 655 |
I am aware of such cd os's, but a flashdrive is writable, so i am working on the assumption that a person would change settings.
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his attitude" - Flutterby
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 580
Fjord artisan
|
Fjord artisan
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 580 |
Yeah, change settings on the flash drive, not on the internal hard drives. Boot from flash drives, leaving the host computer uneffected by the "visit"... I can see this being useful with public PC's such as those at a library. 
|
|
|
|
|