Firstly, I highly doubt that EmLoDnAoR is attempting to write a script that he could have intellectual conversation with. There are thousands of AI bots out there, and while they may not run off neural networks nor be the BEST AI that's out there, they still exist.
Then I suggest you read it again, specifically the part where he talks about telling an mIRC script to write an essay for him.
Also to tell EmLoDnAoR that if he wanted to start on AI, he wouldn't make any success or break new ground for a minimum of 40 years... is like telling Einstein not to bother with physics because people with better grades in math have spent a lifetime, so it would cost him his lifetime to simply match them.
Einstein wrote NO mathematical formulas with any of his theories. In fact it is a well known fact that he even took e= mc^2 from another paper which quoted e=mv^2 (v = velocity). Oh and by the way, your logic is flawed anyway. Do you even read what I said? Einstein was VERY familiar with the work of Newton, he didn't just say "I know nothing about gravity, lets start from scratch!" He saw Newton's work and expanded on it. My argument is valid. If Einstein said "Physics? Whats that?" and then decided to work on the general theory of relativity, he wouldn't have gotten anywhere. He studied the work of others (as I suggested) and learned from their mistakes, namely the inaccuracies of Newton's Universal Laws of Gravitation which were known to have flaws.
Let me regress into 4y/o mode. [insult deleted by moderator. yes it was an insult. yes i deleted it there and now have to delete it here or there wasnt much point in deleting it there].
Yup and that just adds to your credibility on this topic, "I can't come up with anything that makes sense to contradict what you said, so it's time for insults!" Guess I'll just ignore you as well. I guess your post in the general discussion forum of "_" should have given me insight about the kind of person you are.
Lastly, if the original poster took no offense to anything I said, and in fact agreed with at least some of what I said, why exactly did you need to stand up for him and try (unsuccessfully) to dispute everything I said, then insult me? I think if the original poster wanted to do that, he was more than capable of it, I doubt he needs you to be his protector.
I know you most likely won't respond to this, because any time I've ever proven anything you said wrong, or asked you to clarify you simply ignored my post entirely. For example when I asked you why a for loop is inherently slower than a while loop, or when you talked about how constants are rerely global and I asked you to prove it. To sum that up, you make up information to try and disprove others, then when you are asked to defend your statements you simply "forget" to ever reply about the post ever again. I for one no longer believe a single word you say.
