Originally Posted By: Wims
Why did you fill a bug report ?

I consider it inconvenient that I can't easily access exempts, and I figured this might be something that was missed. As you'll find by carefully reading this post, exempts are part of the standard.

Originally Posted By: Wims
On mode is for channel mode, that's why there's on ban on op etc (things related to users).

Thanks, I did quite obviously acknowledge that. You seem to be inadequate at reading. I suggest improving your comprehension skills.

Originally Posted By: Wims
+e isn't in the RFC, that's why there's no event (like the +q/+a)

Neither is RAW 004 , according to RFC1459 (the old standard). However, mIRC still implements $chanmodes, $chantypes, etc. I suppose it depends which RFC you read, huh? Here's a quote from the RFC 2811 (part of the standard for IRC as modified in 2000): "e - set/remove an exception mask to override a ban mask;" Perhaps you didn't know there's an update to RFC1459? Or your comprehension skills need improvement... (edit: fyi, +q and +a are channel modes according to RFC2811, but they don't do what you believe they do... 004 is standard as described in RFC2812)

Originally Posted By: Wims
That's also why there's on rawmode, let you trigger anything you want.

I'm well aware of that, however it doesn't quite provide the functionality that I suggested. Read over my original post carefully if you wish to know more, because I do believe I provided an adequate explanation.

Originally Posted By: Collective
There already exists the on RAWMODE event and $mode. Perhaps the latter should be extended to work for all mode chars which take a parameter.

I'm well aware of that, however it doesn't quite provide the functionality that I suggested. Read over my original post carefully if you wish to know more, because I do believe I provided an adequate explanation.

Originally Posted By: Collective
Until then you can use starbucks_mafia's solution.

I appreciate your suggestion. However after reading over his solution briefly, I won't be using it. I'll post my solution once I'm done, so you can see and hopefully understand why. I would suggest reconsidering the language that you use to infer your suggestions in the future.

Thankyou, guys.

Last edited by s00p; 15/04/10 12:33 PM.