I can understand that it should be consistent, but if anything were to be changed, it should go the opposite way from where you want it to go.
I agree, but do you honestly think that (killing backwards compatibility) would go over well here? I'm arguing the only backwards compatible method to resolve these inconsistencies.
lmao .. so now everyone else is stupid and uneducated because they don't see things your way?
No, not stupid, far from it, just less skilled/experienced. I didn't say
everyone, only commenting on those people that responded earlier to this thread. It's also an assumption, nothing more.
