Forums Scripts & Popups On Close for channels?

Looking at the on close event, it doesn't work for channels...



Like many people I have the "Keep channels open" option ticked.

This means, when I'm kicked/banned from a channel, the window remains open.

I'd like to trigger an event when I close the window, because I'm already parted by being kicked.

Closing the window, closes the window, where as part parts. You can't tie to two together.

Perhaps this is actually a bug... Perhaps On Close needs support for channels.

Should I raise this as a bug?

Thanks.

The ON PART event should work for what you are wanting, as you can't be on the channel and have the window closed.
If you have left the channel by being kicked, this is handled by the ON KICK event, or if banned, the ON BAN event.

Did you read his post ? He his saying that if has been kicked, the channel window stay open because he has the 'keep channels open' option ticked.He wants to know how to trigger the fact that HE closed the window and there is, I think, no proper way to do this.
I think too that some suggestions have been already done about this situations.

Yeh I agree, it makes sence to add # targets to the on close events.

I agree it would make sense, but I also think it should only trigger if you're not joined to the channel.

It's not a bug, but a missing feature. This probably should've been changed when the Keep channels open feature was added.

You could use "on me:PART:#:" if you have yourself on the mIRC User list to prevent the event from triggering on every single part.

on me:*:part:#:{ }

This is how I had to do it.

I don't want it to do anything on part.

When I'm kicked I want it to leave the window open.

The event I'm looking for is when I close the channel window.

This is a missing feature, thus this is a feature request.

Then you should make a post in the Feature Suggestions forum, with the basics of your suggestion and a linked reference to this topic.

Done.

https://forums.mirc.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=216567&page=0#Post216567

For now..



Then you can use:

Guys, please learn to read accurately. A man can't expect to have to repeat himself.

@hixxy seems like a dirty way of doing it, but I guess it'll work. It's still a bug or "missing feature" though really.

@s00p I think it's actually you who needs to read accurately. Please re-read my comments on why On Part isn't suitable here.

Oh yeah it's definitely a nasty hack.. just wanted to show you that it's possible with what we have now, although not ideal.

And s00p was telling them to read, as he knows on part isn't suitable.

Too true, but I think continuing with the feature request is probably the best route, wouldn't you agree?

Ah my mistake then, it seemed like s00p's comment was directed at me.

Where did you get such a ridiculous idea that I was responding to you? Did I respond to one of your messages? Did I quote you?

Please learn to read accurately.

Seriously soop are you that bored?

I wasn't answering the guy who posted this, I was correcting the syntax of the person I responded to.

02/04/2010 - mIRC v7.0

ahaha, i smell the hostility.